[personal profile] aphar
A trivial solution:
  • Make the age when the Social Security benefits start depend on the current demographic situation, e.g., the oldest 10% of the population get the benefits.

  • The specific age when this happens should be computed annually by the BLS.

  • For women, the age should be augmented by the number of their children (i.e., a mother of 3 starts to receive Social Security benefits 3 years earlier than a childless woman born the same year) [ouch! sexism!]

Date: 2005-02-18 02:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aphar.livejournal.com
The argument is that even with demographic swings in the market you will still do better than Social Security's 2.2% return.
statistically across all ages, maybe.
note that this is no longer statistics.
a major part of retirees - baby boomers - are certain to lose money in this scheme because when all of them retire at once and take the money out of the market, the stocks will plummet.

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
111213 14151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 25th, 2026 03:20 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios