Psychiatry
Apr. 25th, 2017 04:12 pmMy problem with psychiatry is the combination of the following two observations:
While I agree that psychiatry is useful, and is usually used in the interests of the patients, I think a more cautious approach to the use of psychotropic drugs is a good idea.
Specifically, using psychotropic drugs usually means that the patient has to keep taking them for life (no exit strategy).
In some cases a more cautious - clinical - approach [1] might be better (
Alas, it is being aggressively disputed [2] touting recent research (which makes fascinating claims like
[1] vs [2] might be the usual turf struggle for funding, but I would hate to see people being medicated for life when it is possible to instead "talk them out of being ill".
PS. See also an old entry.
- Inability of psychiatrists to reliably diagnose mental illness or even agree on what is a mental illness
- Arrogation by psychiatrists of two rights:
- to chemically meddle with the patients' brains
- to deprive the patients of their civil rights by declaring them insane
While I agree that psychiatry is useful, and is usually used in the interests of the patients, I think a more cautious approach to the use of psychotropic drugs is a good idea.
Specifically, using psychotropic drugs usually means that the patient has to keep taking them for life (no exit strategy).
In some cases a more cautious - clinical - approach [1] might be better (
cognitive behavioral therapy, interpersonal psychotherapy and other talking treatments).
Alas, it is being aggressively disputed [2] touting recent research (which makes fascinating claims like
PTSD has been shown to be highly heritable despite being definitionally linked to specific experiences).
[1] vs [2] might be the usual turf struggle for funding, but I would hate to see people being medicated for life when it is possible to instead "talk them out of being ill".
PS. See also an old entry.
no subject
Date: 2017-04-25 10:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-25 10:11 pm (UTC)