A new word in math
Aug. 2nd, 2006 11:17 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
apharHighsmith offers a Classroom Chart - Division:
Apparently, the equivalence a÷b=c ↔ a=b×c is not known to the Highsmith editors.
| 0 | 6÷0=0 |
| 0÷0=0 | 7÷0=0 |
| 1÷0=0 | 8÷0=0 |
| 2÷0=0 | 9÷0=0 |
| 3÷0=0 | 10÷0=0 |
| 4÷0=0 | 11÷0=0 |
| 5÷0=0 | 12÷0=0 |
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
Continuation
Date: 2006-09-21 05:00 pm (UTC)Well, you know about the genetic (and female related one!)nature of that decease. she was to be told for sure after the first baby. What was the second son for?
the more of such case I meet the more sure I get that this system is doomed. At the same time it goes on well enough. Isn't it a prove of its success?
Well, would it be possible to use it for MY case?